What should be in a Risk Engineering Body of Knowledge?
In an era where information is free (just Google it, or, more likely now, ask AI/ChatGPT), this month we’re asking: what should our dedicated group of REBoK volunteers be focussing on for our little piece of the internet? What is the priority for a Risk Engineering Body of Knowledge? Should it be the basics? Or should it be the in-depth, academic, nuanced complicated information that experts can present? Should it be practical or theoretical? Should it be categorised by topics, or phase in a project? Hint: don’t say “yes, all of the above”. We need to prioritise our attention. One thing’s for certain, the more we can narrow the focus, the more likely it is that it will be useful. Otherwise, just use the internet: it’s all there already.
Let’s explore knowledge management, in this month’s Series of Queries.
How the session works
Susan will provide a brief introduction to the topic and some framing of the question depending on the audience, and then some short pre-arranged answers by those who have offered in advance. Then it will shift to a facilitated discussion, Q&A, and opportunity for participants to present views and ideas.
This is not a webinar where attendees are hidden from each other with a one-way presentation from an expert. Rather, it’s meant to be a round-table, idea-sharing, meeting style, where participants can see and hear each other. We hope you’ll come along to participate.
We will be encouraging cameras on, but you can come to listen only. This is meant to be a place for young engineers and professionals to think, organise, and then verbalise those thoughts, opinions, and views. We will be encouraging input from attendees, though we won’t force it.
Join in
REBoK: Series of Queries - What should be in a Risk Engineering Body of Knowledge?
Hosted by EA National Events
>> REGISTER <<